Wednesday, February 6, 2019
Sociology of Racial and Cultural Groups Essay -- Sociology and Race
Three sociological perspectives used in the study of minorities are morphological functionalism, symbolic interactionalism and conflict theory. These perspectives offer theoretical paradigms for explaining how ball club sets people, taking into accounting the social factors that impact on human behavior. However, different theories, ideas, and prejudices can influence a sociologists conclusions. Each of these theories has a contribution to make with a translucent focus. Functional theory was influenced by Emile Durkheim. Adherents of this theory emphasize, Various parts of society have functions or positive effects that promote solidarity and asseverate the stability of the whole. (Parrillo 11) Thus a society is held together by social consensus, or cohesion whereby members of the society agree upon and work together to achieve what is surmount for society as a whole. The social structure consists of status positions, roles and institutions (family, rearing and religi on), and members that share common values. It is a system of interrelated and independent parts, and all(prenominal) of these parts plays an important role in fulfilling certain functions for a glisten operation of society. Functionalists think that all elements of society should function together to moderate order and stability, and under ideal conditions, a society would be in a state of balance with all parts interacting harmoniously.Problems come almost when the social system is no longer functional offsetting societys balance. . The most everyday cause for this disarrangement is rapid social change, which causes conflicts. Because the focus is on social stability an important issue in this analysis of societal disorganization is whether to restore the ... ...to attain socioeconomic growth, educational and job opportunities, and also maintain ethnic solidarity. Alba and Nee indicate that we will have a correct understanding of ethnic and racial differences if we re fine the assimilation theory to appeal differences in settlement, language acquisition, and mobility patterns. REFERENCESJanzen, Rod. Melting Pot or Mosaic. Educational leadership 799-11Ruane, Janet M. and Karen A. Cerulo. 1997. Education is the Great Equalizer. Pp156-162 in Seeing Conventional recognition through the Sociological Eye. California. Pine Forge Press. Parrillo, Vincent J. 2003. Strangers to These Shores. New York Allyn and Bacon.Dzgourides, George and Christeie S. Zgourides. 2012. Cliffs Quick reappraisal Sociology New York. IDG Books Worldwide Inc. Samuelson, Robert J. 2014 Can America Assimilate. Time, April 9, pp42
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment