Criticism of Philosophers

There ar umteen large(p) philosophers who have had m any great ideas over the centuries. These philosophers have had their ideas passed down to many nation through the centuries, decades, and years. Fredric Nietzsche, Rene Decartes, and Socrates are philosophers that many ism students study. How ever so, not everybody likes or agrees with these philosophers philosophies. The purpose of this paper is to give information about the common chord philosophers lives, work, and philosophies. Also, in this paper on that point leave be criticism of each of the philosophers.Lets begin with a discourse of Socrates. Socrates was a Greek philosopher who taught another Greek philosopher named Plato. Even though Socrates is horizon to be a great Greek philosopher, we have n superstar of his writings. Therefore, many Greek scholars are not sure whether what is on the page is what Socrates taught Plato or Platos own thoughts. Socrates background is interesting, but now lets talk about som e of Socrates philosophic views. Derek Johnston claims that Socrates thought that in that location was some(prenominal) well-behaved in the world however he believed that virtue was the net honour adequate to(p).Johnston goes on to claim that Socrates firmly believed that no outside source could disrobe people of virtue (Johnston, 2006, 11). In short, Socrates was mostly concerned with the branch of doctrine called ethics. Socrates also firmly believed that the quest for knowledge was the most important social occasion and by obtaining knowledge about things is the only way people mother truly virtuous. Johnston also claims that Socrates was also attempting to find the true significance of good words such as true, good, and beautiful apply the question and answer method of inquiry.He also held firm that Socrates main teaching was that knowledge equals virtue which can and is obtained through reason. In fact, Socrates held strongly that any opinion that someone had tha t wasnt based on reason should be discarded (Johnston, 2006, 11). Rene Descartes philosophy seemed to be based on doubt and certainty. Decartes began to arm his philosophical stance by doubting everything that could be doubted. But, even Decartes believed that there were things that couldnt be called into question.The things that Decartes believed couldnt be called into question were his creative activity and the being of God. Decartes believed that his existence couldnt be doubted because he was sitting down cerebration about whether or not he existed, among other things. Therefore, he believed that if he doubted things then, he must exist. In other words, Decartes believed he thought therefrom he was. He more famously put it as I think therefore I am. The Latin for this saying is Cogito Ergo tally (Johnston, 2006, 76).This argument is sometimes simply known as Cogito. Decartes also was a rationalist. Rationalists believe that there are things that have to be true and that t here are things that have to be false. He also believed in the existence of God. His argument for the existence of God basically says that im holy beings, which are adult males, be on their existence both beginning and continuing upon a perfect being which is God. In addition, according to Johnston, Decartes believed that minds are separate things from bodies (Johnston, 2006, 77).Both Socrates and Friedrich Nietzsche had a philosophical view that was based on ethics. Nietzsche was big on honorableity. He wished to send a materialistic basis for his moral principles. At the beginning of his ethics, he believed that both good and evil were simply ways of illustrating that some actions were good for society and other actions were bad and didnt benefit society. But, later he thought of good and evil in absolute teams (Johnston, 2006, 142). Nietzsche attacks philosophy from an ethical standpoint however, he promoted only two sets of ethical levers.One ethical value was pride in ones elf and ruthlessness and philosophy, music, and poetry. Nietzsche thought there were some good ethical qualities that human beings could achieve however he believed that all human beings could strive to deposit the good moral qualities but only a few exceptional human beings could actually get those good moral qualities. According to Johnston, Nietzsches nobleman man will have a cruel will and will sacrifice his fellow men. In addition, his noble man will be both disciplined and cunning in war (Johnston, 2006, 145).Nietzsches greatest philosophical view is called the Will to Power. Nietzsches Will to Power is the last-ditch source of both what is and what will be for human beings. Strong people will be able to get the will to power and weaker people will not be able to get the will to power. According to Johnston, Nietzsches will to power allows peoples current moral judgments and determine which are the moral judgments and values of society to be washed away forever. Then, and only, then can a new set of pure moral values and judgments emerge (Johnston, 2006, 147).In addition, a hero for Nietzsche is a man who rises above and beyond his fellow piece by the strength and will of his own powers be them physical or mental or both. His hero will never be pitiable for his superiority in fact he should relish and rejoice in it. Compare and Contrast It may seem as if because Socrates, Rene Decartes, and Fredric Nietzsche were born and lived at different times and in different centuries that none of these three philosophers philosophical views would have similarities to them. However, there are similarities to these three philosophers philosophies.Rest assured that there are differences in these three philosophers philosophies, but first lets counsel on the similarities of these three philosophers philosophical viewpoints. Both Socrates and Fredric Nietzsche subscribe to the school of philosophy called ethics. In fact, according to Johnston, Socrates view of li fe centered mostly on ethics and ethical concerns (Johnston, 2006, 11). Also, both Socrates and Nietzsche tried to find the real meaning of ethical terms such as good, trust, bad, and beautiful by direction of asking questions and getting answers.In fact, Socrates used the question and answer method to require into many moral definitions and many moral issues such as justice. nowhere is this question and answer method of philosophical inquiry more patent than in Platos dialogue called The democracy. In Platos dialogue The Republic through Socrates Plato explored both the definition of justice and the concept of justice itself. Plato also talked about what philosophy is and the many types of government that is used to run a state. Plato even talked about what he believed was the best form of government.Both Socrates and Nietzsche believed that there was one thing that would make people virtuous. Socrates believed that possessing knowledge and Nietzsche believed that having the str ength of will was the ultimate virtue. In addition, both Socrates and Nietzsche also believed that few people will ever achieve either virtue. These are the only similarities in the midst of the three philosophers Descartes, Socrates, and Nietzsche. These three philosophers had more differences between them than similarities. Lets look at thee differences between them now.