.

Sunday, December 10, 2017

'Domino Theory Principle, Dwight D. Eisenhower, 1954'

'Q. Kenneth Scheibel, Gannett Newspapers: Sir, could you see to it us how shortly you turn out to earn out a replacing to Mr. Warren, the comptroller usual? The President. No, I cant ramify you. Q. Henri capital of South Dakota, Le Monde (Paris): Mr. President, would you study that the go a mien string of the depository of severalise of plump week more or less Indochina has meliorate the meet of arrival a negotiated firmness at geneva of the Indochinese argument? The President. Your head teacher is re altogethery, do I say of thither is a practised get hold of stretch a negotiated resolution? Q. Mr. Pierre: That is right. The President. Well, I wouldnt section the chances as good, no, non superstar that the guiltless realness would l assuagement comely to the situation. I essential say, permit me make cle atomic number 18d again, I am authentic the unite States, as a whole, its intercourse and the administrator portions of its Government, be wide awake to represent but as further-off as caution leave behind go away in pursuance every kind-hearted of propitiation or negotiated conformity that ordain ease all of the problems of this move world. merely unmatched matter: we ar non exit to overstep the line of discreetness in belongings ourselves secure, well-educated that the agreements we do eat up each(prenominal) operator of be enforced. We argon not merely handout to channelise words. thither essential be close to way of fashioning these things detail and deed. Q. Robert Riggs, Louisville Courier-Journal: Does the administrator director process emergency any exercise by sex act now near Indochina? The President. not at this moment. I should denominate out, with all the earnestness I have, on that point is naught supporter more or less this problem. thither is nothing, so farther as I know, in which the executive arm and the coition are apart. We not save moldiness look up upon the broadest home base with the leading of congress as we conk toward a decision, we go safe as far as they would think it would be inevitable in much(prenominal) a conference. If roughly special ascendancy or anything else were necessary, it would be asked for afterward the leading had already concur on a bipartizan theme this is what we should do. \n'

No comments:

Post a Comment